当前位置：在线题库搜索＞[单选题]The carrier was responsible for the damage to the licorice for he failed to（）.的答案是什么？
问题：
[单选题]The carrier was responsible for the damage to the licorice for he failed to（）.
A、recooper the broken cases
B、endorse the bill of lading
C、make a proper stowage
D、remove the foreign material in it
参考答案：
C
相关内容
- ● If the carrier i reponible for the damage or lo of the cargo，（）will have to pay to the inurance company.
- ● If he i a common carrier，he i abolutely reponible to the owner of the good carried （）any lo or damage to them unle caued by an Act of God or the Queen’ enemie，or the inherent vice in the good themelve，or the negligence of the owner of the good，or a general average acrifice.
- ● The carrier wa reponible for the damage to the licorice for he failed to（）.
- ● The invariable reult of（）average i that the lo fall on the owner of the particular property which ha uffered the damage，whether that damage wa due to deliberate acrifice or to an accident.
- ● Such remark a WITHOUT RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGE OR SHORTAGE will be conidered（）by a court.
- ● Owner are to be reponible for lo of or damage to the good or delay in delivery of the good only in cae the lo，damage or delay ha been caued by the improper or negligent towage of the good．Thi mean that（）.
- ● The hip will be reponible for the cargo loaded or unloaded（）.
- ● A hip i reponible for the cargo loaded or unloaded（）.
- ● The hip will be reponible for the cargo loaded or unloaded（）.
- ● The carrier i liable for lo of or damage to the good or delay in delivery caued by fire，（）the claimant prove that the fire aroe from fault or neglect on the part of the carrier，hi ervant or agent.
- ● Although good have been lot or damaged whilt in the cutody of the Shipowner，（）not necearily reponible，for hi liability in repect of them may have been excluded by the rule of common law or by the expre term of the contract or by tatute.
- ● The damage wa caued（）the tevedore.
